Archive for category On The Go
A couple of months ago I did not know anything about it. Things sometimes come slowly. This time for a reason.
It is not a muscle as you know it from your arms and your tights and your fingers. It is more like a network of capacity that connects different parts of your brain to perform a task. That task could be to register and recognize and evaluate a visual expression, as you find it in a photograph.
This network acts much like a muscle. When you neglect it, it dies away. When you activate it, it starts to work for you. On its own.
You talk about being able to do fast and frugals (See page *). To run on autopilot (See page *). These rely on your visual muscle functioning and being properly trained.
Put it to use, train it, it gets stronger and more reliable. Quite literally you get better at whatever it is you are doing.
If you have but little beforehand, you get something. If you already are well equipped, you get stronger. No matter what activity and process you want to improve. Could be looking at a photograph. Could be even browsing reality itself.
Confronted with a picture there is a chain of actions that is triggered. First the registration of the object (if it is an object), in the retina. Then the signalling to an area at the back of your brain, to pick up the raw data. Then tiny arms reach out to other areas and bring in the full capacity of both you body and brain to get a grip of what the photograph is all about. Perceiving a photograph is a tall order even if it seems so easy.
Did you, by the way, know that the far larger part of you perception of any visual is based on your unconsciousness? Some say 95 percent. Did you also know that about 30 percent of your total brain capacity has been set aside to handle visual stimuli? Not touching, smelling, hearing or tasting. But seeing.
The conscious part of your perception and the unconscious part of it work in tandem. They support each other to make out the whole picture. It is a combination of below the line and above the line perception. With below the line as the locomotive.
That aside. What you need to take away from this knowledge is this: First, be aware that you rely on your unconsciousness to a much larger extent than you could have imagined. Second, as your unconsciousness draws on the whole battery of acquired knowledge, experience and training you will always perceive what you see a little differently from others. Sometimes very differently.
Third, and maybe the most important is you can train your visual muscle to work for you. Even if you are hard wired to a certain disposition, such a hard wiring can be modified.
This will not happen over a weekend even if you set your mind to it. More likely over a lifetime.
Copenhagen, August 20, 2014.
© Knut Skjærven. All rights reserved
You are sometimes discouraged to combine words and visuals.
Purists are of the opinion, that photographs must come alone and not be disturbed by accompanying texts, that in one way or other, might functions as leads or teasers to a photograph. And thereby disturb the visual message.
This is sometimes argued when people talk about giving images titles. A title possibly suggesting a certain reading or seeing of the image. Purists can’t have that.
There are purists all over. As if a photograph ever came alone.
It should be a different matter when you include texts in the photograph itself. Then the words become part of the visuals as in People Parking (#28).
Such texts can take the form of signs as in People Parking shot in Copenhagen during the Jazz Festival in July 2014. You see the signs on the wall.
It is the combination of signs, people, composition, framing, etcetera that makes the image. Wouldn’t you say? The two people relaxing under the parking sign. The arrows, and the word Reception pointing to the entrance. Europe Famous Hostels. The two girls entering the house.
Words and visuals work together as if teasing each other in a new and humorous way. In a moment that will never exist again. That is why you as a photographer are so important to capture these moments.
When words and visuals comes together fluently, as I would say that they do in this lucky shot, the photograph lifts from being plain documentation to being an Itching Street Image. It becomes a proper street photograph.
The takeaway from these thoughts is extremely simple: look for signs. Make them work in conjunctions with the rest of your shot, as I was lucky to have them work for me in this picture.
Images like this do not come often. You have to press your luck for them. When it happens you have made your day.
One thing is for sure. If you don’t look for signs you well never see them. The message is: look for signs and make them work in the visual context.
We call it to Sign In On Signs. No reasons why you should not be good at it.
One last word. Does these shots come just like that. They might but it is not likely. I saw the potential reading the signs, lingered in the area for a while and then came back and took the picture.
Copenhagen, August 16, 2014.
© Knut Skjærven
It is rather familiar. I am sure you already know what I am going to write about here but you may not have thought it through in terms of photography. In terms of street photography.
It goes like this: If you want to look good you need to make sure that you do. Going for a job interview you need to dress for the occasion. Going on a first date you dress to make a grande impression. Make sure you smell good too.
Much of the visual communication we entangle works on a latent, subliminal level. Like in a job interview, like at a first date. Even in the photographs we send off into virtual space. You don’t want to send conflicting, ambiguous signals. You want to be fluent and precise in what you say.
The word goes that you will never get a second chance to make a first impression. Being fluent in what you do is important. Particularly for visual communication like photography. It is a question of doing the right things in the right order. Not too much and not too little. To the point of the occasion.
There are interesting research results that you might want to consider. In trying to sell recipes for food one of the promotions was executed with a lean and easy to read typeface. The other promotion used a typeface that was harder to read.
Not only was the second promotion easier to comprehend. It effected the evaluation of the product as well.
Does this translate to photography? I think it does. The less fluently you are as a photographer the harder your message will be to understand. There is more to it. The less likeable you will be as a communicator.
The takeaway from this might well be to pay more attention to what a) you shoot and b) how you shoot it. Make sure you limit the visual options and that you position each part in an orderly way to one another. Be articulate.
As I said, most of us already know this. The question is how well do we handle it on a day to day basis? When out taking pictures. I know, I don’t’ always live up to it. Then some afterthought will do well. To prepare you better for the next time.
Could it be that particularly in street photography all encounters with people are like job interviews? Like the first date with a stranger? You want to fit the occasion when you show your work publicly.
You give the answers. Make sure you are fluent about it. Occam would love it if you were.
If you want more on this, please search for fluency effect on Google. There are plenty.
Common sense will do as well.
Copenhagen, August 15, 2014.
© Knut Skjærven